To Ratify, or Not, the Constitution as Presented

Constitution Day is little observed. But The Poughkeepsie Journal reported today that the Trinity Episcopal Church in Fishkill, New York, will, as part of its 250th anniversary celebrations, host this weekend “A Publick Debate between Mr. Patrick Henry of Virginia and Mr. James Wilson of Pennsylvania on the Choice of Whether to Ratify the Constitution of the United States.”

According to the Journal, Mr. Henry and Mr. Wilson will remain in character.

“These are professional actors who portray these characters for a living and have thoroughly researched them,” said Villforth. “They come in authentic costumes, and will always stay in character. They will not refer to the current time period or discuss current events.”

Although the debate consists of a rehearsed performance, the actors are prepared to make impromptu remarks, as well. They treat the audience as if they were from the 18th-century press, and questions are welcome.

Mr. David Hume of Scotland suggests in his “Idea of the Perfect Commonwealth” that Liberty is better preserved in a large Republic.

At the same time, the parts are so distant and remote, that it is very difficult, either by intrigue, prejudice, or passion, to hurry them into any measures against the public interest.

During the recent dispute with Great Britain, Committees of Correspondence were formed to coordinate like-minded citizens in the diverse Colonies. Do either of the gentlemen think that, if we ratify this large Republic, there may be any hazard to Liberty from improvements in the postal service which may permit the measures against the public interest to be hurriedly enacted?