<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Borders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coxesroost.net/journal/2008/03/16/borders/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coxesroost.net/journal/2008/03/16/borders</link>
	<description>Asking the Stupid Questions since 1971</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 04:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.coxesroost.net/journal/2008/03/16/borders#comment-35984</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coxesroost.net/journal/2008/03/16/borders#comment-35984</guid>
		<description>In my eyes, the main reason two people don't get along is a fundamental difference in world views.  This correlates strongly with ethnicity, and if one geographical region is heavily made up of one group, I don't really understand why people want to keep them "unified" with another, especially if they clearly don't get along.  Sure, the country as a whole would get weaker since it would end up smaller, and I can see how the majority would be upset at losing the natural resources, etc., that they might have been able to control with a unified country, but this "nationalism" is just a selfish rationalization for dominating a neighbor that has so little in common with you to be absurd.

IMO, a government should guarantee a "right to exit" as a fundamental human right.  This includes the right to emigrate, and the right for a region to exit the political system entirely, by way of secession.  How differently would a government behave if it knew that its population could just leave it piecemeal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my eyes, the main reason two people don&#8217;t get along is a fundamental difference in world views.  This correlates strongly with ethnicity, and if one geographical region is heavily made up of one group, I don&#8217;t really understand why people want to keep them &#8220;unified&#8221; with another, especially if they clearly don&#8217;t get along.  Sure, the country as a whole would get weaker since it would end up smaller, and I can see how the majority would be upset at losing the natural resources, etc., that they might have been able to control with a unified country, but this &#8220;nationalism&#8221; is just a selfish rationalization for dominating a neighbor that has so little in common with you to be absurd.</p>
<p>IMO, a government should guarantee a &#8220;right to exit&#8221; as a fundamental human right.  This includes the right to emigrate, and the right for a region to exit the political system entirely, by way of secession.  How differently would a government behave if it knew that its population could just leave it piecemeal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
