<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lowering My Health Care Costs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coxesroost.net/journal/2008/02/21/lowering-health-care-costs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coxesroost.net/journal/2008/02/21/lowering-health-care-costs</link>
	<description>Asking the Stupid Questions since 1971</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.coxesroost.net/journal/2008/02/21/lowering-health-care-costs#comment-35901</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 03:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coxesroost.net/journal/2008/02/21/lowering-health-care-costs#comment-35901</guid>
		<description>Cheaper for thee, but not for me.

I'm concerned about &lt;em&gt;my&lt;/em&gt; costs, not the costs of the company providing "insurance." My time is expensive. In this case, i didn't select the company; my employer did. I'm not their customer; my employer is. They have absolutely no incentive at all to ensure my satisfaction.

On the other hand, the Mid-Hudson Medical Group does. I'm their patient. But their voice mail jail rivals that of AT&#38;T. One gets the impression that they don't want you to schedule an appointment, and don't really think that it could be an emergency. Unfortunately their competition was just as bad.

At the Associated Press, incoming calls were handled by people. But there was no pool of staff sitting waiting for incoming calls. The AP had receptionists. They answered the phones too. The AP had reporters. They answered the phones too. On some days, you even Lou Boccardi answered the phone. 

At 911, people answer the phone. It's a matter of life or death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheaper for thee, but not for me.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m concerned about <em>my</em> costs, not the costs of the company providing &#8220;insurance.&#8221; My time is expensive. In this case, i didn&#8217;t select the company; my employer did. I&#8217;m not their customer; my employer is. They have absolutely no incentive at all to ensure my satisfaction.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the Mid-Hudson Medical Group does. I&#8217;m their patient. But their voice mail jail rivals that of AT&amp;T. One gets the impression that they don&#8217;t want you to schedule an appointment, and don&#8217;t really think that it could be an emergency. Unfortunately their competition was just as bad.</p>
<p>At the Associated Press, incoming calls were handled by people. But there was no pool of staff sitting waiting for incoming calls. The AP had receptionists. They answered the phones too. The AP had reporters. They answered the phones too. On some days, you even Lou Boccardi answered the phone. </p>
<p>At 911, people answer the phone. It&#8217;s a matter of life or death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Nesting</title>
		<link>http://www.coxesroost.net/journal/2008/02/21/lowering-health-care-costs#comment-35899</link>
		<dc:creator>David Nesting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coxesroost.net/journal/2008/02/21/lowering-health-care-costs#comment-35899</guid>
		<description>So you want to lower (apparent) costs by making it more expensive to take calls?  Even if you spend 5 hours on the line trying to think of ways of strangling the machine on the other end, it's still probably cheaper than sending the call to a human that knows what they're doing.  Especially if you give up, because if they can wear you down so that you give up trying, then clearly you didn't need to talk to them in the first place.

Spin it another way: How much would you pay, out of your own pocket, to guarantee that your call was promptly answered by a clueful human being?  I sense a business plan brewing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you want to lower (apparent) costs by making it more expensive to take calls?  Even if you spend 5 hours on the line trying to think of ways of strangling the machine on the other end, it&#8217;s still probably cheaper than sending the call to a human that knows what they&#8217;re doing.  Especially if you give up, because if they can wear you down so that you give up trying, then clearly you didn&#8217;t need to talk to them in the first place.</p>
<p>Spin it another way: How much would you pay, out of your own pocket, to guarantee that your call was promptly answered by a clueful human being?  I sense a business plan brewing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
