If Mrs. Clinton, or Messrs. McCain or Obama would like to lower health care costs, then perhaps they could encourage Congress to start by requiring that all insurance companies, doctors (and anybody else who conducts inter-state commerce) have a real live human being answer the [EXPLETIVES DELETED] PHONE ON THE FIRST [MORE EXPLETIVES] RING. Any company using a [EXPLETIVES FOLLOWED BY MORE EXPLETIVES] INTERACTIVE [EXPLETIVE] VOICE [EXPLETIVE] RESPONSE system should be fined their market capitalization, have their CEO ground into small little bits, their offices razed to the ground, and their fields sown with salt.
Computers should NEVER answer the phone.
-
So you want to lower (apparent) costs by making it more expensive to take calls? Even if you spend 5 hours on the line trying to think of ways of strangling the machine on the other end, it’s still probably cheaper than sending the call to a human that knows what they’re doing. Especially if you give up, because if they can wear you down so that you give up trying, then clearly you didn’t need to talk to them in the first place.
Spin it another way: How much would you pay, out of your own pocket, to guarantee that your call was promptly answered by a clueful human being? I sense a business plan brewing…
Comments are now closed.

2 comments